COMPARISON OF NUTRIENT COMPONENTS OF CHINESE LETTUCE AND AMERICAN LETTUCE

Authors

  • Xueping Shi Department of Engineerning and Technology of Jiangsu Institute of Comerce, 211168, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China;
  • Fang Yu Department of Engineerning and Technology of Jiangsu Institute of Comerce, 211168, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China;
  • Caiyun Jiang Department of Engineerning and Technology of Jiangsu Institute of Comerce, 211168, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China;
  • Hongtao Wang Department of Engineerning and Technology of Jiangsu Institute of Comerce, 211168, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China;
  • Yukui Rui Stockbridge School of Agriculture, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.9755/ejfa.2015-08-603

Keywords:

Food preference, Lettuce, Nutrient components, China, USA, Trace elements

Abstract

Food preference affects the human health and food species, and different countries have different food preference and habits. Lettuce was selected to study the effects of food preference on the food nutrition of Chinese foods and American foods. The results showed that the Chinese lettuce can store much less time than the lettuce from United States, which should be caused by that lettuce from China has more leaves and less stalks than that from USA, and Chinese lettuce contain more moisture. Llettuce from China significantly contained more protein and fatty acids than those from USA, but contained less carbohydrate and dietary fiber; and concentrations of most trace elements (Ca, Fe, Zn, Se, Cu) in lettuce from China were significantly higher than that from USA except Mn. The suggestion is that the different varieties of lettuce should be exchanged for food, which can make the human body nutritional balance of Protein, fatty acids, carbohydrate, dietary fiber.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2015-09-11

How to Cite

Shi, X., F. Yu, C. Jiang, H. Wang, and Y. Rui. “COMPARISON OF NUTRIENT COMPONENTS OF CHINESE LETTUCE AND AMERICAN LETTUCE”. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture, vol. 27, no. 10, Sept. 2015, pp. 790-2, doi:10.9755/ejfa.2015-08-603.

Issue

Section

Short Communication